Portfolio value intelligence

One view of enterprise value

Performance, strategy, exposure and delivery in a single picture — with a name against every part of it and a date on every decision.

See the model Request a walkthrough

Portfolio view — value, domains and open decisions

The idea behind Conspectus

A portfolio is steered from four separate documents that are produced on four different dates by four different people. Each one is accurate. Together they do not answer the only question an owner has: what is this worth, and what is about to change it.

Conspectus puts those four on one page and keeps them there. Not as a report — as the place where the month is actually run.

Built inside portfolio companies over four years — in boardrooms and monthly management meetings, not in a product studio.

Owners already have data. What they lack is one place to steer from.

The information exists. It is the arrangement of it that costs money.

How it usually sits

Financial performance in a monthly pack.
Risk in a register with its own review date.
Strategy in a deck that no ledger line refers back to.
Delivery in the heads of the people doing it.
Actions from the last board meeting in somebody's inbox.

What that costs

Decisions arrive a quarter after the cheapest moment to make them.
Problems are seen by people who cannot fix them.
Priority goes to whoever presented last, not to what is worth most.
At exit, the case has to be reconstructed instead of retrieved.

Why portfolio companies stall

Rarely for lack of dashboards. Almost always for one of these four.

Signals sit apart

Margin, churn and downtime are each discussed in their own meeting. The compound effect on next year's multiple is discussed in none of them.

Nobody holds it

A problem is acknowledged and then belongs to the meeting rather than to a person. Nothing moves, and nobody is at fault.

The board explains the past

Most of the agenda goes to what already happened, and the little that is left goes to the interventions that decide what happens next.

Execution loses rhythm

Priorities are agreed and then depend on management capacity in a busy month. Six weeks later nobody can say whether they moved.

One view, running continuously

Conspectus is not a monthly artefact. It is a view that stays open: value signals come in, findings get an owner, decisions get a date, and outcomes are written back against the earnings line they were supposed to move.

Because it runs continuously, a soft month is visible in week two rather than in the pack that lands six weeks later — while the intervention is still cheap.

How a month runs

Where value is made and lost

Eight domains, deliberately not the org chart. They follow where value is created, which is why the same eight work across very different companies. Each has one owner of record — there to bring the intervention, not the explanation.

Market

Is the market moving toward us or away from us, and how fast?

Commercial

Do we convert that movement into revenue at a price we can defend?

Delivery

Do we deliver what was sold — on time, at quality, at the assumed cost?

Customer

Do customers stay, spend more, and say why when they do not?

Operations

Does the cost base scale more slowly than the revenue it carries?

Organisation

Do we have the people, systems and automation the plan assumes?

Capital & partners

Are suppliers, partners and capital working as hard as the balance sheet says?

Resilience

What would still be true after a bad year — and what would not?

From signal to decision

The same six steps every month, for every company in the portfolio.

Gather
Finance, ERP, CRM, operational and sustainability inputs land in one place, on one calendar.
Translate
Raw measures become value signals: what this number does to earnings, growth or confidence.
Locate
The view shows where value is building, where it is blocked, and where it is quietly draining away.
Assign
Each finding gets an owner, an intervention, and a number for what is at stake.
Decide
Board and management rhythms are used to choose, not to be briefed.
Prove
Every closed action is traced back to the earnings line or the risk it removed.

Value is earnings multiplied by confidence

Two companies with identical earnings do not sell for identical money. The difference is how well the story holds when a buyer takes it apart: whether the numbers reconcile, whether the risks were known before they were asked about, whether the last three plans did what they said they would.

That is not a soft quality. It is a record — and a record can be built on purpose.

The layer between ownership and execution

Conspectus does not replace your finance system, your CRM or your warehouse. It is the layer above them where their outputs are finally allowed to mean something to each other.

Value & valuation

Portfolio and valuation intelligence

Earnings quality, growth and multiple potential per company and across the portfolio, in one set of definitions.

Performance

Execution tracking

Every priority with an owner, a date and an expected impact — and what actually happened to it.

Exposure

Risk and resilience

Commercial, operational and regulatory exposure held next to the earnings it threatens, rather than in a separate register.

Sustainability

ESG that affects price

Compliance readiness and stakeholder exposure, tracked where they belong: with the things that set the multiple.

More than reporting

Built for the way owners actually govern.

Institutional governance

Every decision keeps the name of the person who made it, and the date they made it.

Portfolio comparability

The same domains and definitions everywhere, so a portfolio view is addition and not translation.

Data integration

Reads what your systems already produce. Where a feed does not exist, a structured form does the job until it does.

AI-assisted, not AI-decided

Models draft, summarise and flag. People decide, and the record says who.

Operating rhythm

A monthly and quarterly cadence that usually replaces meetings rather than adding to them.

Execution support

When an owner is stuck, the constraint is named — capacity, mandate or clarity — instead of reappearing next month.

Enterprise value is not reported into existence. It is executed into existence.

Designed for owners and for management teams

Both sides have to want it, or it becomes another reporting obligation.

Private equity owners

One comparable view across every company you hold.
Priority argued in euros at stake instead of in seniority.
An evidence base that is retrieved at exit, not reconstructed.
Early sight of the quarter that is about to go wrong.

Portfolio companies

Less time assembling packs, more time on the three things that matter.
A board meeting that decides instead of being briefed.
Clear ownership, so problems stop belonging to the meeting.
Credit for what was delivered, on the record.

Software shows the signal. People close the gap.

We are careful about what a platform can honestly claim. A system can show that delivery is slipping and what it costs. It cannot hire the operations manager, renegotiate the contract, or tell a founder something they would rather not hear.

So Conspectus is sold as what it is: the view, the ownership and the rhythm. Where an owner needs hands rather than sight, we say so — and that is a different conversation, often with someone else.

Built from practice, not theory

Conspectus started as a spreadsheet in one portfolio company, made because the monthly pack could not answer what the quarter was worth. It became a working method across several companies before it became software.

That order matters. Everything in it exists because a meeting needed it — not because it looked good in a product roadmap. We remain deliberately small and take on a limited number of portfolios at a time.